[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Indexing::
Contact us::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
Copyright Policy
..
:: year 6, Issue 1 (5-2019) ::
CJS 2019, 6(1): 60-68 Back to browse issues page
Evaluating the scientific outputs of information management researchers in WoS
Sholeh Zakiani , Saied Ghaffari * , Mehdi Mohseni
Department of Knowledge and Information Science, Payame Noor University, Qom, Iran , ghaffari130@yahoo.com
Abstract:   (3133 Views)
Background and aim: The scientometrics are one of the most efficient methods of evaluating scientific outputs. The aim of the present study was to investigate the scientific outputs of all information management researchers in the Web of Science (WoS) in 2000-2018.
Material and methods: This applied study was performed using co-word analysis. The statistical population included all scientific outputs (n=2810) of information management researchers, indexed in ISI during 2000-2018 (2810 records). The required data were collected from the mentioned database through entering “information management” words into the subject field and compiled into Excel as well as the required tables and charts were drawn. Moreover, the data needed to draw the maps in Tab Delimited format were collected and entered into Excel software. Co-authorship maps of institutions and countries were then drawn for visualization using VOS-Viewer software.
Findings: The results showed that the most productive topics were in the fields of computer science as well as information engineering and library science. China, the United States (US) and the United Kingdom (UK) were ranked first to third in science production. The US, UK and Germany were ranked highest in cooperation between countries, respectively. The Washington University had the most scientific outputs, and the universities of Leipzig, Wisconsin, Heidelberg, Amsterdam, Carolina, Washington and so on were top in inter-university collaborations.
Conclusion: The results showed that during this period, the data release process had many ups and downs. Acquiring top ranks in the production of science by developed and modern countries such as the US, UK, China and Germany has indicated that the use of new technologies, information tools and modern information sources plays a leading role in the agility of science production. The universities both are empowered and play a significant role in the advancement of science in this way. Therefore, other countries should make additional efforts to achieve this by using a knowledge sharing and networking approach. They must be members of information networks to find partner and co-authoring couples and enjoy free information services.
Keywords: Scientific outputs, Information management, Science mapping, ISI
Full-Text [PDF 712 kb]   (1149 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Orginal | Subject: Scientometrics
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA



XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Zakiani S, Ghaffari S, Mohseni M. Evaluating the scientific outputs of information management researchers in WoS. CJS 2019; 6 (1) :60-68
URL: http://cjs.mubabol.ac.ir/article-1-183-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
year 6, Issue 1 (5-2019) Back to browse issues page
Caspian Journal of Scientometrics
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 39 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645